- Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission - http://ethics.ga.gov -

ADVISORY OPINION NO 2010-05:Whether Advisory Opinion No. 2001-32 is still valid so that the Georgia Ethics in Government Act (the “Act”) does not apply to activity that is limited to independent spending that does not include express words of advocacy for or against a clearly indentified candidate.

Posted By gaethics On March 8, 2011 @ 6:00 pm In Advisory Opinions | Comments Disabled

Whether Advisory Opinion No. 2001-32 is still valid so that the Georgia Ethics in Government Act (the “Act”) does not apply to activity that is limited to independent spending that does not include express words of advocacy for or against a clearly indentified candidate.

The Center for Individual Freedom (the “Center”) has requested this Opinion to determine if the State Ethics Commission has changed its position on the regulation of independent spending that does not include express advocacy of an identified candidate or a political result. In its Advisory Opinion No. 2001-32, the Commission stated that the independent committee provisions of the Act were intended to reach groups which raise and expend funds to expressly advocate the election or defeat of a particular candidate. The statutory language “to advocate or defeat” as explained by the Commission was an acknowledgment and adoption of the express advocacy standard as outlined in Buckley v. Valeo, Secretary of the United States Senate, et al., 424 U.S. 1, 80 (1976).


Article printed from Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission: http://ethics.ga.gov

URL to article: http://ethics.ga.gov/2011/03/advisory-opinion-no-2010/

Copyright © 2011 Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission. All rights reserved.